A correct edit can still be the wrong edit
When can a grammatically correct edit be the wrong edit? The answer lies in meaning, voice, and editorial judgment—and in knowing when a sentence is better left alone.
When can a grammatically correct edit be the wrong edit? The answer lies in meaning, voice, and editorial judgment—and in knowing when a sentence is better left alone.
When should an editor make a change, and when should the author be consulted? The difference is not always obvious. One seemingly simple edit can clarify a sentence, but another can quietly change what the author intended to say. Knowing where to draw that line is an important part of editorial judgment.
Rushing through a manuscript may seem efficient, but fast editing often creates unnecessary rework. Discover why thoughtful editorial decisions save time, improve quality, and help manuscripts move more smoothly through author review and publication.
Not every sentence that can be edited should be edited. Discover why experienced copy editors sometimes choose to leave a sentence exactly as it is and how editorial judgment is measured by the quality of decisions rather than the number of tracked changes
Every edit changes a manuscript in some way. Learn why experienced copy editors think carefully before making changes and how purposeful editing helps improve a manuscript without introducing new problems.
Many new copy editors correct the first error they notice. Experienced editors take a different approach. Discover why editing in a deliberate sequence leads to better decisions, fewer revisions, and a more effective copyediting process.